首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME).
【2h】

The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME).

机译:在乌干达高传播地区引入疟疾快速诊断测试的干预措施对发烧病例管理的影响:一项混合方法集群随机试验(PRIME)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) have been scaled-up widely across Africa. The PRIME study evaluated an intervention aiming to improve fever case management using mRDTs at public health centers in Uganda. A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010-13 in Tororo, a high malaria transmission setting. Twenty public health centers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. The intervention included training in health center management, fever case management with mRDTs, and patient-centered services; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when stocks ran low. Three rounds of Interviews were conducted with caregivers of children under five years of age as they exited health centers (N = 1400); reference mRDTs were done in children with fever (N = 1336). Health worker perspectives on mRDTs were elicited through semi-structured questionnaires (N = 49) and in-depth interviews (N = 10). The primary outcome was inappropriate treatment of malaria, defined as the proportion of febrile children who were not treated according to guidelines based on the reference mRDT. There was no difference in inappropriate treatment of malaria between the intervention and control arms (24.0% versus 29.7%, adjusted risk ratio 0.81 95\% CI: 0.56, 1.17 p = 0.24). Most children (76.0\%) tested positive by reference mRDT, but many were not prescribed AL (22.5\% intervention versus 25.9\% control, p = 0.53). Inappropriate treatment of children testing negative by reference mRDT with AL was also common (31.3\% invention vs 42.4\% control, p = 0.29). Health workers appreciated mRDTs but felt that integrating testing into practice was challenging given constraints on time and infrastructure. The PRIME intervention did not have the desired impact on inappropriate treatment of malaria for children under five. In this high transmission setting, use of mRDTs did not lead to the reductions in antimalarial prescribing seen elsewhere. Broader investment in health systems, including infrastructure and staffing, will be required to improve fever case management.
机译:在非洲,疟疾的快速诊断检测已得到广泛推广。 PRIME研究评估了旨在改善乌干达公共卫生中心使用mRDT的发烧病例管理的干预措施。从2010-13年在疟疾高发地区的托罗罗进行了一项集群随机试验。 20个公共卫生中心以1:1的比例随机分配以进行干预或控制。干预措施包括培训健康中心管理,使用mRDT进行发烧病例管理以及以患者为中心的服务;当库存不足时,还要提供mRDT和蒿甲醚-荧光黄素(AL)。对五岁以下离开保健中心的儿童的照顾者进行了三轮访谈(N = 1400);在发烧儿童中进行了参考mRDT(N = 1336)。通过半结构化问卷(N = 49)和深度访谈(N = 10),得出了卫生工作者对mRDT的看法。主要结局是对疟疾的不当治疗,定义为未根据基于参考mRDT的指南进行治疗的高热儿童的比例。干预组和对照组之间对疟疾的不适当治疗没有差异(24.0%对29.7%,调整后的风险比0.81 95 \%CI:0.56,1.17 p = 0.24)。大多数儿童(76.0%)通过参考mRDT测试呈阳性,但许多儿童未开AL(22.5%干预vs 25.9%对照,p = 0.53)。参比mRDT对AL呈阴性的儿童的不当治疗也很常见(31.3%的发明对比42.4%的对照,p = 0.29)。卫生工作者赞赏mRDT,但由于时间和基础设施的限制,将测试整合到实践中具有挑战性。 PRIME干预措施对五岁以下儿童的疟疾治疗不当具有预期的影响。在这种高传播环境中,使用mRDT并不会导致其他地方看到的抗疟药处方减少。将需要对卫生系统进行更广泛的投资,包括基础设施和人员配备,以改善发烧病例管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号